We’re proud to announce that Attorney Pete Faust and O’Neil Cannon’s mergers and acquisitions team have been recognized by Chambers and Partners as among the top in Wisconsin for M&A and general corporate law.

O’Neil Cannon is one of only seven Wisconsin firms ranked by Chambers and Partners in this category. Faust, the firm’s president and managing shareholder, is one of just 23 Wisconsin attorneys to earn individual recognition for excellence in M&A.

In addition to Faust, O’Neil Cannon’s mergers and acquisitions team includes Dino Antonopoulos, JB Koenings, Britany Morrison, Chad Richter, Jason Scoby, James DeJong, Brady Dettmann, Cate Heerey, Michael Kennedy, Jason Meehan, Samuel Nelson, and Nancy Wilson.

Chambers and Partners, a London-based research firm, evaluates law firms and attorneys across 185 countries. Each year, more than 200 researchers conduct thousands of interviews with lawyers and clients to identify and rank the leading professionals in the legal field.

O’Neil Cannon advised Engendren Corporation in its recent sale to Cummins Inc., a global powertrain manufacturer. Over the past couple of years, Engendren has experienced tremendous growth, and it looks forward to continued advancement and expansion as Cummins invests in improving Engendren’s capabilities. This support will further enable Engendren to provide world class cooling solutions for all its customers. Engendren is part of the Cummins Power Systems Business but will continue to operate independently.

The O’Neil Cannon deal team was led by Chad Richter with assistance provided by Pete Faust, Britany Morrison, Sam Nelson, Erica Reib, Nick Chmurski, and Kelly Kuglitsch.

O’Neil Cannon advised Guetzke and Associates in its recent sale to Ryan Fireprotection, Inc. Established in 1977, Guetzke and Associates is the premier provider of fire alarm and detection systems in Southeast Wisconsin. Its services include engineering, design, installation, service, inspections, and monitoring. Ryan Fireprotection is one of the largest fire protection companies in the Midwest providing a full range of high-quality, custom fire protection systems. As Ryan Fireprotection stated, “We can’t wait to combine our efforts to Protect. Prevent. Preserve!”

The O’Neil Cannon deal team was led by Chad Richter with assistance provided by Britany Morrison, Sam Nelson, Erica Reib, and Kelly Kuglitsch.

Attorney Pete Faust and O’Neil Cannon’s mergers and acquisitions team have been named by Chambers and Partners as among Wisconsin’s best deal lawyers.

O’Neil Cannon is one of only seven Wisconsin law firms ranked by Chambers in the mergers and acquisition/general corporate category.

Faust, the firm’s president and managing shareholder, is one of 23 Wisconsin lawyers individually honored by Chambers in the same category.

In addition to Faust, O’Neil Cannon’s mergers and acquisitions team includes JB Koenings, Britany Morrison, Chad Richter, Jason Scoby, James DeJong, Dennis Hollman, Nicholas Chmurski, Michael Kennedy, Samuel Nelson, and Nancy Wilson.

Chambers is a London-based research firm that ranks the top lawyers and law firms in 185 countries. More than 200 Chambers researchers interview thousands of lawyers and clients as part of an in-depth analysis of the leading lawyers and law firms.

O’Neil Cannon advised i3 Product Development (i3) in its recent sale to Helios Technologies (NYSE: HLIO). i3, a custom engineering services firm with over 55 engineers, specializes in electronics, mechanical, industrial, embedded, and software engineering. Its solutions are used across many sectors, including medical, off-highway, recreational and commercial marine, power sports, health and wellness, agriculture, consumer goods, industrial, sports, and fitness. i3 has business locations in both Sun Prairie and Middleton, Wisconsin.

Helios Technologies is a global leader in highly engineered motion control and electronic controls technology for diverse end markets, including construction, material handling, agriculture, energy, recreational vehicles, marine, and health and wellness.

Josef Matosevic, Helios’ President and Chief Executive Officer, stated, “The acquisition of i3 Product Development will turbocharge our efforts to be the most innovative company focused on the intersection of the hydraulics and electronics markets. This flywheel acquisition fits into our technology roadmap strategy like a glove and will continue to make us incredibly tough for our competition to follow.”

The O’Neil Cannon deal team was led by Attorney Chad Richter with assistance provided by O’Neil Cannon attorneys Britany Morrison, Nick Chmurski, Erica Reib, Sam Nelson, and Michael Kennedy.

The Paycheck Protection Program has been commonly heralded as the foremost source of financial relief for businesses during COVID-19. However, the Employee Retention Credit or “ERC,” is a lesser-known replacement or supplement for PPP that has remained largely unleveraged by employers. Enacted in March of 2020 under the CARES Act, the ERC provides qualifying employers with tax relief and potential refundable tax credits for all or a portion of the 2020 and 2021 tax years, up to $26,000 per full time employee in the best-case scenarios. Although originally created under the CARES Act, the ERC has been the subject of numerous amendments, modifications and IRS interpretations, all of which have muddied the waters for employers seeking to responsibly and accurately file for the credit. With this complex backdrop, this article will describe the general requirements and procedure for claiming the credit in addition to answering frequently asked questions regarding the same. However, any employer seeking to file for the ERC should first coordinate with its advisors, particularly its accountants and attorneys, to ensure accuracy, navigate potential pitfalls, and to avoid liabilities in applying for and claiming the credit.

How to Qualify – Eligible Employers

The threshold question for any business seeking to claim ERC is whether the business constitutes an “eligible employer,” a requirement that can be met in one of three ways. Eligible employers must fall into one of the following categories:

1. The business was fully or partially suspended due to a government order during 2020, 2021, or some period therein (“Full or Partial Suspension”);
2. The business experienced a significant decline in gross receipts during a 2020 or 2021 quarter (“Sales Testing”); or
3. The business was a “recovery startup.”

For clarity, both for-profit as well as non-profit organizations may take advantage of the ERC provided that the entity constitutes an eligible employer.

Full or Partial Suspension: For a business to constitute an eligible employer via Full or Partial Suspension, the Federal government, or a state or local government having jurisdiction over the business, must have promogulated orders or other mandatory proclamations or decrees that suspend more than a nominal portion of the business’s operations. Under Full or Partial Suspension, a business will constitute an eligible employer for those periods of time that the applicable governmental orders caused the business to be fully or partial suspended.

Sales Testing: For a business to constitute an eligible employer via Sales Testing, the business must have experienced a significant decline in gross receipts for each calendar quarter in which the business is claiming the ERC.

• For 2020, a business will be deemed to experience a significant decline in gross receipts beginning as of the first 2020 calendar quarter in which the business’s gross receipts measure less than 50% of gross receipts for the same calendar quarter in 2019, and this Sales Testing period will continue to run until the first calendar quarter after the business’s gross receipts measure more than 80% of gross receipts for the same calendar quarter in 2019.
• For 2021, a business will be deemed to experience a significant decline in gross receipts for each calendar quarter in which the business’s gross receipts measure less than 80% of gross receipts for (i) the same calendar quarter in 2019 or (ii) the immediately preceding calendar quarter in 2019. Additionally, for businesses not in existence in 2019, a business may opt to use 2020 calendar quarters as the comparative quarters for Sales Testing.

Recovery Startups: For a business to constitute an eligible employer as a recovery startup, the business must have begun operations after February 15, 2020, and have less than $1,000,000 in revenue for the applicable calendar year(s).

Extent of Employee Retention Credit – Qualified Wages

For those businesses that constitute an eligible employer, the ERC is (i) limited to a percentage of “qualified wages” paid to employees during the applicable calendar quarter, and (ii) first credited against “applicable employment taxes,” with the remainder refunded to the taxpayer, all with different rules applicable in different calendar quarters.

• 2020 Q1 – Q4:
  • For eligible employers with no more than 100 full time employees, qualified wages mean all wages paid to any W-2, full time employee, during the Full or Partial Suspension or Sales Testing Period.
  • ERC is limited to $5,000 per employee, equivalent to 50% of the qualified wages paid to each employee during the applicable Full or Partial Suspension or Sales Testing period up to $10,000 in qualified wages per employee for the entire 2020 calendar year.
• 2021 Q1 – Q3:
  • For eligible employers with no more than 500 full time employees, qualified wages mean all wages paid to any W-2, full time employee, during the Full or Partial Suspension or Sales Testing Period.
  • ERC is limited to $7,000 per employee per fiscal quarter, equal to $21,000 across the first three quarters of 2021, equivalent to 70% of the qualified wages paid to each employee during the applicable Full or Partial Suspension or Sales Testing period up to $10,000 in qualified wages per employee per fiscal quarter.
• 2021 Q3 – Q4:
  • The same rules as 2021 Q1 – Q3 apply, but recovery startup businesses may claim ERC not to exceed $50,000 for quarters 2021 Q3 and 2021 Q4, provided that the recovery startup does not qualify for or claim ERC under Full or Partial Suspension or Sales Testing.
  • Additionally, for 2021 Q4, ERC is only available for businesses that constitute post recovery startups and is no longer available for businesses via Full or Partial Suspension or Sales Testing.

Coordination with Other Programs – PPP and ERC

ERC may be limited for otherwise eligible employers when the business took part in other COVID relief or tax credit programs. Although an eligible employer may claim ERC even if the business received PPP loan forgiveness, the employer’s qualified wages taken into account for ERC purposes must be reduced by any qualified wages constituting “payroll costs” in connection with PPP loan forgiveness. Additionally (among several other limitations), to avoid double-dipping on wage-based tax credits, wages taken into account for various other tax credits, including the following, may not also be utilized in claiming ERC: (i) R&D tax credit; (ii) Indian Employment Credit; (iii) Active-Duty Members Credit; (iv) Work Opportunity Tax Credit; and (v) Empowerment Zone Employment Credit.

Claiming the Employee Retention Credit – Procedure and Applicable Deadlines:

Today, the method by which an eligible employer claims the ERC is by amending its Form 941 quarterly federal tax returns (via Form 941-X). Additionally, businesses will generally have to amend their income tax returns in connection with claiming the ERC as any deductions taken for qualified wages will have to be reduced to the extent of the ERC received. The credit is available for as long as a business is able to amend its original form 941s. For an eligible employer’s 941s filed in connection with the 2020 fiscal year, the business will generally have until April 15, 2024, to file a 941-X, three years after the general deemed filing date for such 941s. For an eligible employers 941s filed in connection with the 2021 fiscal year, the business will generally have until April 15, 2025, to file a 941-X, three years after the general deemed filing date for such 941s. However, due to the lead time associated with filing for, being approved for and receiving any applicable refund in connection with the ERC, as well as the general requirement that the business’s applicable income tax returns be amended, businesses desiring to claim the ERC should consider taking steps to claim the credit sooner rather than later, allowing for significant lead time.

Disclaimer – Seek Legal and Accounting Advice

Given the legal and accounting complexity associated with the Employee Retention Credit, any individual or business seeking to claim the credit must reach out and coordinate with their attorneys and accountants to determine the extent to which they qualify for ERC, if at all. This article is for informational purposes only and should not be relied on as either legal or accounting advice.

For questions or further information relating to the Employee Retention Credit please contact Attorney Samuel D. Nelson or Attorney Chad J. Richter.

O’Neil Cannon advised Diamond Vogel, Inc. in its recent acquisition of N92 Menomonee Falls, LLC, a subsidiary of The Sherwin-Williams Company. The acquired business, founded in 1951 as Raabe Paint Company, is based in Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin. It employs approximately 100 employees and manufactures color-match touch up paint, custom aerosol, and other specialty coatings.

According to Jeff Powell, Diamond Vogel’s President and CEO, the acquisition allows Diamond Vogel to accelerate its aerosol growth strategy. In addition, the Menomonee Falls team’s expertise in aerosol manufacturing adds depth and breadth to Diamond Vogel’s already existing aerosol manufacturing capabilities. Diamond Vogel, Inc., based in Orange City, Iowa, is a manufacturer of high-quality paint and coatings. Diamond Vogel also has manufacturing operations in Sheboygan Falls, Wisconsin because of its previous acquisition of Faase Paint Company’s aerosol manufacturing business.

The O’Neil Cannon deal team was led by Attorney Jim DeJong with assistance provided by O’Neil Cannon attorneys Britany Morrison, JB Koenings, Joseph Gumina, Nick Chmurski, and Sam Nelson.

In April of 2022, Wisconsin passed new business entity laws, greatly impacting limited liability companies and their members, and largely overhauling and replacing Chapter 183 of the Wisconsin Statutes, which governs LLCs. This article will help you identify the key changes under the new LLC laws, as well as point you towards the next steps in preparing for this overhaul—including decisions to be made before year-end. For purposes of this article, we’ll refer to the new Chapter 183, the Wisconsin Uniform Limited Liability Company Law (WULLCL), as the “New LLC Laws,” and refer to the pre-WULLCL Chapter 183 as the “Old LLC Laws.”

The first significant deviation from the Old LLC Laws impacts your LLC’s operating agreement—the agreement governing the relationship between the members or owners of an LLC. Under the New LLC Laws, the meaning of an “operating agreement” has been expanded to include not only your formal, written agreements (if you have one), but also any verbal agreements, implied understandings, and any combination thereof. It has always been important for the members of an LLC to have a written operating agreement to clearly set forth the understandings governing their relationship. However, that importance is magnified under the New LLC Laws now that you must ensure that ancillary agreements, whether verbal or implied, do not rule the day on a particular issue or disagreement between members.

The New LLC Laws have also brought changes to the reach of certain fiduciary duties that members or managers may owe one another. Under the Old LLC Laws, members and managers of an LLC could waive some of these duties, including those duties of good care and loyalty, as well as the obligation of good faith and fair dealing. However, under the New LLC Laws, these duties are now mandated against members and managers by default unless otherwise provided for in your operating agreement (subject to restraints on how far fiduciary duties can be limited). With that said, if your LLC has an operating agreement currently in place that provides for the waiver of these duties, that waiver will be valid and honored under the New LLC Laws.

Another impactful departure from the Old LLC Laws relates to a member’s authority to act on behalf of your LLC simply by virtue of their status as a member (commonly referred to as “apparent authority”). Under the New LLC Laws, the members of your LLC are not automatically granted the authority to act on behalf of the company merely because they are members. Instead, this authority needs to be established, most often either by documentation in your LLC’s operating agreement, or by filing a Statement of Authority with the Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions (“WDFI”). Whichever the method, those documents need to set forth who or what positions in your LLC possess the authority to act on behalf of the company as an agent.

The New LLC Laws may also broaden the rights of certain members to access information regarding your LLC, purely as a result of their membership status, and with no regard for their role in management. Where the Old LLC Laws were silent as to a dissociated member’s right to access an LLC’s information, the New LLC Laws make clear that dissociated members possess the same rights to access, inspect and copy information regarding an LLC and its activities as an active member possesses, albeit these rights must be exercised through a representative. This means that under the New LLC Laws, a dissociated member may have the right to access certain sensitive information regarding your LLC, including its financial statements, subject to certain statutory restrictions or restrictions set forth in your operating agreement.

Depending on your circumstances, it may also be worth considering some of the more technical updates brought on by the New LLC Laws, particularly with respect to your LLC’s Articles of Organization—your company’s charter. For one, under the Old LLC Laws, the management designation had to be set forth in your LLC’s Articles. However, under the New LLC Laws, if you want your LLC to be managed by a manager or group of managers specifically rather than the members generally, then your LLC’s operating agreement must provide for this designation, but its Articles can remain silent as to the same. With that said, your LLC’s Articles, in addition to your operating agreement, may still provide for a management designation if your members so choose. Additionally, under the New LLC Laws, your LLC’s Articles must provide for both a street address and an email address for your LLC’s registered agent.

Given all these updates, the WDFI has provided LLCs with the opportunity to opt in to the New LLC Laws early or opt out in favor of the Old LLC Laws. If you want your LLC to opt in to the New LLC Laws, you can either file a Statement of Applicability no later than December 31, 2022, or, alternatively, do nothing between now and the end of the year and your LLC will automatically be governed by the New LLC Laws beginning January 1, 2023. However, if you want your LLC to opt out of the New LLC Laws and continue to be governed by the Old LLC Laws, you must file a Statement of Nonapplicability no later than December 31, 2022. Additionally, this opt-out filing should be paired with member or manager approval, likely in the form of a consent resolution approving the filing.

If you have any doubts or concerns about your LLC being governed under the New LLC Laws, it may be worth filing a Statement of Nonapplicability before the end of the year, even if only precautionary. If you ever decide to be governed by the New LLC Laws in the future, you can simply file a Statement of Applicability and opt in, but once opted in—whether by default on January 1, 2023, or by an opt-in filing—your LLC cannot revert back to governance under the Old LLC Laws.

As always, O’Neil Cannon is here for you. We encourage you to reach out with any questions, concerns, or legal issues you may have.

Attorney Samuel D. Nelson, a magna cum laude graduate of Marquette University Law School, has joined O’Neil, Cannon, Hollman, DeJong and Laing. Sam will join the firm’s Business Law Practice Group, where he will be assisting clients in a wide variety of business law matters. While in law school, Sam was a research assistant to Dean and Professor Joseph Kearney at Marquette University Law School and a board member for the Marquette University Law Review. He also volunteered for both the Milwaukee Justice Center and the ABA Legal Answers Clinic. We are very pleased to have Sam join OCHDL.

OCHDL, founded in Milwaukee in 1973, is a full-service law firm that focuses on meeting the many needs of businesses and their owners. Our experienced attorneys work with businesses and their owners at all stages of the business life cycle, helping them start, grow, and transition their businesses. We also assist business owners with their personal legal needs, including tax and estate planning, and family law. For more information about the types of services we provide, please visit our website or contact your OCHDL attorney.