Categories: Articles

"The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court"

With a one sentence opinion, the United States Supreme Court issued its first deadlocked ruling following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. The ruling came in a creditors’ rights case that languished before the Court for some time, hinting of a divided Court on the issue prior to Scalia’s death.

In Hawkins v. Community Bank of Raymore, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit addressed a dispute between a bank and a developer that defaulted on its loans from the bank. The two members of the developer and their spouses guarantied the loans. The spouses of the guarantors of the loan sued the bank, alleging they were required to guaranty the loan only because of their spousal status and, therefore, were discriminated against pursuant to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (“ECOA”). The district court granted summary judgment to the bank, holding that the spouses were not “applicants” who gained protections of the ECOA. The Eighth Circuit affirmed, reasoning the plain language of the ECOA provides that a person is an “applicant” only if he or she requests credit, but a guarantor does not, simply by executing a guaranty, request credit, and, therefore, the marital status protections of the ECOA did not apply. Conflicting authority exists in the Sixth Circuit.

The Supreme Court granted the petition for writ of certiorari in March of 2015, and oral argument was held in October of 2015. The Court had not issued a decision as of Scalia’s death on February 13, 2016, indicating a potentially close decision.

The one sentence decision indicating the deadlock was issued on March 22, 2016. When the Supreme Court is deadlocked at 4–4, the decision of the lower court stands, but it does not have precedential value. Therefore, the bank remained victorious over the spouses, and the circuit split remains unresolved.

Although certainly short and sweet, the Court’s first deadlocked decision following the death of Justice Scalia speaks volumes on what future United States Supreme Court decisions hold.

Published by
Melissa Blair

Recent Posts

Employment LawScene Alert: FTC Bans Employee Non-Competes, but Legal Challenges Expected

The administrative agencies are having a busy week! In addition to the DOL issuing an…

3 days ago

Employment LawScene Alert: DOL Issues Final Overtime Rule with Significant Salary Threshold Increase

Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, non-exempt employees are entitled to overtime pay at 1.5…

4 days ago

A Beginner’s Guide to Trademarks: Part One—Trademark Basics

What is a Trademark? A trademark can be any mark representing words, phrases, symbols, designs,…

1 week ago

Employment LawScene Alert: Biden Proposed Budget Has Labor and Employment Signals

On March 11, 2024, President Biden released the Budget of the U.S. Government for Fiscal…

1 month ago

O’Neil Cannon Serves as Legal Advisor to Engendren Corporation in its Sale to Cummins Inc.

O’Neil Cannon advised Engendren Corporation in its recent sale to Cummins Inc., a global powertrain…

2 months ago

Wisconsin Expands Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit

Wisconsin families received a significant boost with the recent signing of Assembly Bill 1023. The…

2 months ago