Employment LawScene Alert: Supreme Court Decides Security Check Time Doesn’t Need to be Paid Time

On December 9, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk et al., ruling that time spent waiting to undergo and undergoing security screenings after work each day is not compensable time under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). This case involved a collective claim by employees of a temporary staffing agency who worked at Amazon warehouses in Nevada retrieving products from shelves and packaging those products for delivery. These employees were required to pass through a security check after the end of their shift to make sure that they had not pilfered any product from the warehouse. At times, employees were required to wait as long as 25 minutes in line before they could leave the premises.

In overruling the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court held that the activity of waiting in a security line, after work, was not a “principal activity or activities which the employee is employed to perform” because they were hired to retrieve products from warehouse shelves and package them, not to go through security screenings. Pursuant to the Portal-to-Portal Act, an employer is not required to pay minimum wage or overtime compensation for activities which are preliminary or postliminary to an employee’s principal activities. The U.S. Department of Labor deems that the term “principal activities” encompasses “all activities which are an integral part of the principal activity,” including those related activities which are “indispensable to its performance.”

The Court concluded that the security screenings were not “integral and indispensable” to the employees’ duties because it was not an intrinsic element of retrieving products from shelves and packaging them for shipment and could have been eliminated if the employer so desired.   The Court found that the Ninth Circuit had erred in focusing on whether the employer required an activity because that was too broad of an interpretation and the focus under the FLSA and Portal-to-Portal Act is whether the activities are “integral and indispensable” to the productive work that the employee is employed to perform.

Employers should take note of this decision in determining what pre- and post-shift activities must be compensated.  Time spent performing activities related to an employee’s duties, such as donning and doffing protective gear that is necessary for performing an employee’s job duties, should generally be compensated.  However, not all activities, such as waiting at a security check and waiting in line to receive pay checks, are compensable.

Published by
ONeil Cannon

Recent Posts

Former O’Neil Cannon Attorneys Devoted to Public Service

A number of former O’Neil Cannon attorneys have devoted a substantial portion of their professional…

5 hours ago

College Athletics Are A-Changing

The transfer portal and NIL (name, image, and likeness) payments have recently significantly changed the…

1 week ago

Spring Cleaning for Your Business: Consider Your Document Retention Practices

Spring is the season for cleaning and organization—and it can also be a good time…

1 month ago

Wisconsin Incentivizes “Closing Credits” by Opening New Tax Credits for Filmmakers

A significant development to Wisconsin’s economic and cultural policy is now underway, as Governor Tony…

1 month ago

O’Neil Cannon Adds Four Shareholders

O’Neil Cannon is pleased to announce that Christina Ruud, Cate Heerey, Nancy Wilson, and Max…

2 months ago

O’Neil Cannon Welcomes Attorney Sabrina Dornan

O’Neil Cannon is pleased to announce that Sabrina Dornan has joined the firm. Dornan focuses…

2 months ago