Categories: Articles

Understanding Alternative Dispute Resolution in Wisconsin: An Overview

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) offers a way for parties to resolve business disputes without going through a civil trial. ADR may take place before or after a lawsuit is filed. Many contracts, including construction, securities and Internet terms-of-service contracts, increasingly require ADR before or instead of trial. Generally speaking, courts have found these provisions enforceable.

The phrase “alternative dispute resolution” is an umbrella term covering several different types of proceedings. Direct negotiation, mediation and arbitration are the most popular forms of ADR. Although the rules differ for each, all three are intended to try to resolve a civil legal dispute without going to trial.

In Wisconsin, courts can order parties to participate in ADR. Wisconsin Statute Section 802.12(2) empowers Wisconsin Circuit Court judges to require ADR prior to trial. The parties generally are free to choose the type of ADR they wish to utilize and the ADR service provider, although the judge may make these decisions for the parties if they cannot agree.

Wisconsin judges cannot, however, require that the parties participate in the more expensive types of ADR, including non-binding arbitration, summary jury trials, or multiple facilitated ADR processes (such as both mediation and arbitration), without the parties consent.

Also, while a Wisconsin judge can require the parties to participate in ADR, he or she cannot require them to settle their dispute. In Gary v. Eggert, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that while Section 801.12 allows a judge to require some form of ADR before trial in appropriate cases, it does not allow the judge to require that the parties resolve the dispute, abandon one or more legal positions or settle out of court. The right to trial must remain available to the parties even if they are sent to ADR prior to trial.

Federal courts, including those in Wisconsin, also can order parties to participate in ADR.  28 U.S.C. 651(b) allows federal district court judges to authorize the use of ADR in civil actions and bankruptcy adversary proceedings. In the United State District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, Local Rule 16(d) governs ADR considerations. In the United State District Court for the Western District Local Rule 3 (LR 16.6CJ) governs ADR.

If you have any questions, please contact attorney Grant C. Killoran at grant.killoran@wilaw.com or 414-276-5000.

 

Published by
Grant Killoran

Recent Posts

O’Neil Cannon Welcomes Attorney Geron Eatherly

O’Neil Cannon is pleased to announce that Geron Eatherly, a cum laude graduate of the…

1 week ago

19 O’Neil Cannon Lawyers Selected as 2027 Best Lawyers; Another 3 Named Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch

We are pleased to announce that 19 of our lawyers have been included in the…

2 weeks ago

O’Neil Cannon Softball Team Wraps Up Another Great Season

The O'Neil Cannon softball team closed out its 2026 season after another summer of competition,…

3 weeks ago

O’Neil Cannon Welcomes Attorneys Sydney Kojis and Rachel Sweet

O’Neil Cannon is pleased to welcome attorneys Sydney Kojis and Rachel Sweet to the firm.…

1 month ago

O’Neil Cannon Attorneys Recognized in Wisconsin Legal 250

O’Neil Cannon is proud to announce that attorneys Jim DeJong, Jason Scoby, Steve Slawinski, and…

2 months ago

The Sandwich Generation Survival Guide: Protecting Your Family and Your Sanity

If your typical Wednesday involves writing a college tuition check in the morning and interviewing…

2 months ago